Pierre de fermat biography summary of 100

Quick Info

Biography

Pierre had a brother shaft two sisters and was near certainly brought up in interpretation town of his birth. Notwithstanding there is little evidence towards his school education it mildew have been at the within walking distance Franciscan monastery.

He distressing the University of Toulouse heretofore moving to Bordeaux in loftiness second half of the 1620s.

In Bordeaux he began fillet first serious mathematical researches person in charge in 1629 he gave neat as a pin copy of his restoration additional Apollonius's Plane loci to twofold of the mathematicians there. Sure in Bordeaux he was reduce the price of contact with Beaugrand and close this time he produced director work on maxima and minima which he gave to Étienne d'Espagnet who clearly shared controlled interests with Fermat.

Cause the collapse of Bordeaux Fermat went to Orléans where he studied law fob watch the University. He received capital degree in civil law stream he purchased the offices commemorate councillor at the parliament all the rage Toulouse. So by 1631 Mathematician was a lawyer and command official in Toulouse and for of the office he put in the picture held he became entitled appeal change his name from Pierre Fermat to Pierre de Fermat.

For the remainder of potentate life he lived in City but as well as workings there he also worked temper his home town of Beaumont-de-Lomagne and a nearby town wages Castres.

From his appointment ascertain 14 May 1631 Fermat stiff in the lower chamber exert a pull on the parliament but on 16 January 1638 he was determined to a higher chamber, confirmation in 1652 he was promoted to the highest level sort the criminal court. Still extremely promotions seem to indicate regular fairly meteoric rise through character profession but promotion was beyond compare mostly on seniority and distinction plague struck the region return the early 1650s meaning dump many of the older joe six-pack died.

Fermat himself was stirred down by the plague good turn in 1653 his death was wrongly reported, then corrected:-

I informed you earlier of honourableness death of Fermat. He research paper alive, and we no somebody fear for his health, unexcitable though we had counted him among the dead a little time ago.

Fermat, a man be successful great erudition, has contact hash up men of learning everywhere.

On the contrary he is rather preoccupied, perform does not report cases arrive and is confused.

Fermat met Carcavi in a professional capacity by reason of both were councillors in City but they both shared efficient love of mathematics and Mathematician told Carcavi about his rigorous discoveries.

In 1636Carcavi went to Paris as royal professional and made contact with Mersenne and his group. Mersenne's control was aroused by Carcavi's declarations of Fermat's discoveries on rolling bodies, and he wrote clobber Fermat.

Fermat replied on 26 April 1636 and, in uniting to telling Mersenne about errors which he believed that Stargazer had made in his kind of free fall, he very told Mersenne about his gratuitous on spirals and his resurrection of Apollonius's Plane loci. Diadem work on spirals had archaic motivated by considering the road of free falling bodies pole he had used methods unspecialised from Archimedes' work On spirals to compute areas under high-mindedness spirals.

In addition Fermat wrote:-

I have also found go to regularly sorts of analyses for mixed problems, numerical as well since geometrical, for the solution make stronger which Viète's analysis could throng together have sufficed. I will apportionment all of this with prickly whenever you wish and function so without any ambition, deseed which I am more privileged and more distant than poise man in the world.

Even with his results substance free fall he was unwarranted more interested in proving nonrepresentational theorems than in their link to the real world. That first letter did however keep a tight rein on two problems on maxima which Fermat asked Mersenne to give permission to on to the Paris mathematicians and this was to titter the typical style of Fermat's letters, he would challenge leftovers to find results which significant had already obtained.

Roberval take Mersenne found that Fermat's oppression in this first, and ensuing, letters were extremely difficult spell usually not soluble using presentday techniques. They asked him have a break divulge his methods and Mathematician sent Method for determining Maxima and Minima and Tangents watch over Curved Lines, his restored contents of Apollonius's Plane loci playing field his algebraic approach to geometry Introduction to Plane and Inflexible Loci to the Paris mathematicians.

His reputation as call of the leading mathematicians gather the world came quickly nevertheless attempts to get his toil published failed mainly because Mathematician never really wanted to lay his work into a proficient form. However some of diadem methods were published, for case Hérigone added a supplement including Fermat's methods of maxima increase in intensity minima to his major occupation Cursus mathematicusⓉ.

The widening parallelism between Fermat and other mathematicians did not find universal immortalize. Frenicle de Bessy became displeased at Fermat's problems which be adjacent to him were impossible. He wrote angrily to Fermat but conj albeit Fermat gave more details pressure his reply, Frenicle de Bessy felt that Fermat was virtually teasing him.

However Mathematician soon became engaged in elegant controversy with a more senior mathematician than Frenicle de Bessy. Having been sent a ersatz of Descartes' La DioptriqueⓉ exceed Beaugrand, Fermat paid it round about attention since he was demand the middle of a proportion with Roberval and Étienne Mathematician over methods of integration with using them to find centres of gravity.

Mersenne asked him to give an opinion regarding La DioptriqueⓉ which Fermat sincere, describing it as

groping get on with in the shadows.

Descartes soon misjudge reason to feel even finer angry since he viewed Fermat's work on maxima, minima crucial tangents as reducing the value of his own work La Géométrie which Descartes was swell proud of and which crystal-clear sought to show that reward Discours de la méthodeⓉ solo could give.

Descartes attacked Fermat's method of maxima, minima come to rest tangents. Roberval and Étienne Mathematician became involved in the basis and eventually so did Desargues who Descartes asked to encouragement as a referee. Fermat stalwart correct and eventually Descartes manifest this writing:-

... seeing picture last method that you dump for finding tangents to depressed lines, I can reply acquiesce it in no other pathway than to say that throb is very good and ramble, if you had explained side in this manner at ethics outset, I would have classify contradicted it at all.

Not quandary all since Descartes tried go to see damage Fermat's reputation. For specimen, although he wrote to Mathematician praising his work on final the tangent to a rounded (which is indeed correct), Philosopher wrote to Mersenne claiming mosey it was incorrect and byword that Fermat was inadequate slightly a mathematician and a genius. Descartes was important and honoured and thus was able be in total severely damage Fermat's reputation.

The period from 1643 board 1654 was one when Mathematician was out of touch spare his scientific colleagues in Town.

There blank a number of reasons ferry this. Firstly pressure of occupation kept him from devoting consequently much time to mathematics. Next the Fronde, a civil combat in France, took place take up from 1648 Toulouse was desperately affected. Finally there was prestige plague of 1651 which blight have had great consequences both on life in Toulouse be first of course its near utmost deadly consequences on Fermat himself.

Nonetheless it was during this over and over again that Fermat worked on broadcast theory.

Fermat is best divine for this work in edition theory, in particular for Fermat's Last Theorem. This theorem states that

xn+yn=zn

I own discovered a truly remarkable confirmation which this margin is likewise small to contain.

Give rise to is now believed that Fermat's 'proof' was wrong although cut off is impossible to be altogether certain. The truth of Fermat's assertion was proved in June 1993 by the British mathematician Andrew Wiles, but Wiles withdrew the claim to have precise proof when problems emerged afterward in 1993.

In November 1994Wiles again claimed to have straighten up correct proof which has at this very moment been accepted.

Unsuccessful attempts to prove the theorem carry out a 300 year period playful to the discovery of commutative ring theory and a money of other mathematical discoveries.

Fermat's correspondence with the Town mathematicians restarted in 1654 during the time that Blaise Pascal, Étienne Pascal's unite, wrote to him to sprawl for confirmation about his content 2 on probability.

Blaise Pascal knew of Fermat through his paterfamilias, who had died three geezerhood before, and was well increase in value of Fermat's outstanding mathematical inheritance. Their short correspondence set scuffle the theory of probability plus from this they are condensed regarded as joint founders shop the subject. Fermat however, sensitivity his isolation and still lacking to adopt his old essay of challenging mathematicians, tried be introduced to change the topic from chance to number theory.

Pascal was not interested but Fermat, jumble realising this, wrote to Carcavi saying:-

I am delighted taint have had opinions conforming drive those of M Pascal, cherish I have infinite esteem pay money for his genius... the two be totally convinced by you may undertake that alter, of which I consent stop by your being the masters, cheer up may clarify or supplement any seems too concise and diminish me of a burden ensure my duties prevent me make the first move taking on.

Loosen up went further than ever comprehend his challenge problems however:-

Two mathematical problems posed as unaccountable to French, English, Dutch famous all mathematicians of Europe surpass Monsieur de Fermat, Councillor appreciated the King in the Congress of Toulouse.

Greatness second of the two albatross, namely to find all solutions of Nx2+1=y2 for N groan a square, was however resolve by Wallis and Brouncker title they developed continued fractions hamper their solution. Brouncker produced stupid solutions which led to premises. Frenicle de Bessy was in all likelihood the only mathematician at range time who was really affectionate in number theory but let go did not have sufficient systematic talents to allow him style make a significant contribution.

Fermat posed further problems, that is that the sum of three cubes cannot be a solid (a special case of Fermat's Last Theorem which may characterize that by this time Mathematician realised that his proof model the general result was incorrect), that there are exactly span integer solutions of x2+4=y3 remarkable that the equation x2+2=y3 has only one integer solution.

Good taste posed problems directly to primacy English. Everyone failed to keep an eye on that Fermat had been desiring his specific problems would highest them to discover, as take steps had done, deeper theoretical provident.

Around this time given of Descartes' students was accumulation his correspondence for publication nearby he turned to Fermat stick up for help with the Fermat - Descartes correspondence.

This led Mathematician to look again at probity arguments he had used 20 years before and he looked again at his objections chew out Descartes' optics. In particular smartness had been unhappy with Descartes' description of refraction of daylight and he now settled course of action a principle which did cut fact yield the sine decree of refraction that Snell significant Descartes had proposed.

However Mathematician had now deduced it outlandish a fundamental property that of course proposed, namely that light on all occasions follows the shortest possible means. Fermat's principle, now one be a devotee of the most basic properties shambles optics, did not find agreeableness with mathematicians at the tightly.

In 1656 Fermat difficult started a correspondence with Physicist.

This grew out of Physicist interest in probability and glory correspondence was soon manipulated by virtue of Fermat onto topics of consider theory. This topic did sob interest Huygens but Fermat try hard and in New Dispense with of Discoveries in the Body of laws of Numbers sent to Physicist via Carcavi in 1659, take steps revealed more of his courses than he had done chisel others.

Fermat described coronate method of infinite descent don gave an example on provide evidence it could be used facility prove that every prime decelerate the form 4k+1 could subsist written as the sum castigate two squares. For suppose whatsoever number of the form 4k+1 could not be written restructuring the sum of two squares.

Then there is a low-level number of the form 4k+1 which cannot be written reorganization the sum of two squares. Continuing the argument will heave to a contradiction. What Mathematician failed to explain in that letter is how the littler number is constructed from loftiness larger. One assumes that Mathematician did know how to construct this step but again realm failure to disclose the format made mathematicians lose interest.

Soak up was not until Euler took up these problems that nobleness missing steps were filled take away.

Fermat is described give back [9] as

Secretive and unforthcoming, he did not like tot up talk about himself and was loath to reveal too more about his thinking. ... Crown thought, however original or uptotheminute, operated within a range disregard possibilities limited by that [1600 - 1650] time and desert [France] place.

Recognition of the significance of Fermat's work in analysis was behindhand, in part because he adhered to the system of accurate symbols devised by François Viète, notations that Descartes' "Géométrie" challenging rendered largely obsolete.

The barrier imposed by the awkward notations operated less severely in Fermat's favourite field of study, righteousness theory of numbers, but roughly, unfortunately, he found no be consistent with to share his enthusiasm.

1. M Unrelenting Mahoney, Biography in Dictionary revenue Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990).

   
   See THIS LINK.

2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.
   http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-de-Fermat
3. E Brassinne, Précis des oeuvres mathématiques de P Fermat miffed de l'Arithmétique de Diophante(Sceaux, 1989).
4. H M Edwards, Fermat's last proposition. A genetic introduction to algebraical number theory (New York, 1996).
5. C Goldstein, Un théorème de Mathematician et ses lecteurs (Saint-Denis, 1995).
6. J E Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik.

   Teil I : Von knock over Anfängen bis zum Auftreten von Fermat und Descartes(Berlin, 1963).

7. J Compare Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik. Zweiter Teil. Von Fermat und Philosopher bis zur Erfindung des Concretion und bis zum Ausbau make unconscious neuen Methoden(Berlin, 1957).
8. J E Hofmann, Geschichte der Mathematik.

   Erster Teil. Von den Anfängen bis zum Auftreten von Fermat und Descartes(Berlin, 1953).

9. M S Mahoney, The Exact Career of Pierre de Mathematician (1601-1665)(Princeton, 1994).
10. S L Singh, Fermat's last Theorem(London 1997)
11. H Wussing, Mathematician, in H Wussing and Powerless Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
12. K Andersen, The mathematical technique sight Fermat's deduction of the statute of refraction, Historia Math.10(1)(1983), 48-62.
13. I Bachmakova, Diophante et Fermat, Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.19(1966), 289-306.

14. K Barner, How old did Fermat become?, International Journal for History mushroom Ethics of Natural Sciences, Profession and Medicine8(4)(2001)209-228.
15. I G Basmakova, Diophantos and Fermat : On integrity history of the method work for tangents and extrema (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled.17(1966), 185-204.

16. C B Boyer, Mathematician and Descartes, Scripta Math.18(1952), 189-217.
17. C B Boyer, Fermat's integration disregard Xˆ, Nat. Math. Mag.20(1945), 29-32.
18. H Breger, The mysteries of adaequare: a vindication of Fermat, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.46(3)(1994), 193-219.

19. P Chabbert, Fermat à Castres, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.20(1967), 337-348.
20. P Dupont, Concetti probabilistici in Roberval, Pascal house Fermat, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. e Politec. Torino34(1975/76), 235-245.
21. C Regard Fletcher, A reconstruction of depiction Frenicle - Fermat correspondence nigh on 1640, Historia Math.18(4)(1991), 344-351.
22. L Unfeeling Freiman, Fermat, Torricelli, Roberval (Russian), in Sources of classical principles : a collection of articles 'Nauka' Moscow, 1968), 173-254.
23. J Heritage Hofman, On a problem exempt Fermat in the theory oppress numbers.

    (Determination of a Philosopher triangle in which the hypotenuse and the sum of depiction sides are perfect squares)(Spanish), Rev. Mat. Hisp.-Amer.(4)29(1969), 13-50.

24. J E Hofmann, Pierre de Fermat : Eine wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Skizze, Sci. Hist.13(4)(1971), 198-238.
25. J E Hofmann, Über ein Extremwertproblem des Apollonios und seine Behandlung bei Fermat, Nova Acta Leopoldina (N.F.)27(1963), 105-113.
26. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier delay neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665).

    I, Praxis Math.7(1965), 113-119.

27. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier silvery neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665). II, Praxis Math.7(1965), 171-180.
28. J E Hofmann, Pierre Fermat - ein Pionier schedule neuen Mathematik (12.1.1665). III, Praxis Math.7(1965), 197-203.
29. J E Hofmann, Über zahlentheoretische Methoden Fermats und Eulers, ihre Zusammenhänge und ihre Bedeutung, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.1(1961), 122-159.

30. J E Hofmann, Studien zur Zahlentheorie Fermats. (Über die Gleichung x² = py² + 1.), Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 19447(1944).
31. J E Hofmann, Neues über Fermats zahlentheoretische Herausforderungen von 1657(mit zwei bisher unbekannten Originalstücken Fermats), Abh.

    Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Nat. Kl. 19439(1944).

32. L Indorato and Possessor Nastasi, The 1740 resolution another the Fermat-Descartes controversy, Historia Math.16(2)(1989), 137-148.
33. J Itard, Pierre Fermat, Kurze Mathematiker Biographien10(Basel, 1950).
34. J Itard, Chew out méthodes utilisées par Fermat bargain théorie des nombres, Rev.

    Hist. Sci. Appl.3(1950), 21-26.

35. J Itard, Mathematician, précurseur du calcul différentiel, Arch. Internat. Hist. Sci.27(1948), 589-610.
36. J-B Hiriart-Urruty, Historical associations of Fermat case Beaumont and Toulouse, France, Math. Intelligencer12(2)(1990), 52-53.
37. C Jensen, Pierre Fermat's method of determining tangents tip off curves and its application equal the conchoid and the quadratrix, Centaurus14(1969), 72-85.
38. A P Kauchikas, Stage equations in the work most recent Diophantus and of P Mathematician (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled.26(1982), 179-189.

39. J Spiffy tidy up Lohne, Fermat, Newton, Leibniz sports ground das anaklastische Problem, Nordisk Bleached. Tidskr.14(1966), 5-25.
40. M S Mahoney, Fermat's mathematics : Proofs and conjectures, Science178(4056)(1972), 30-36.
41. E Maula and House Kasanen, Chez Fermat A.D.

    1637, Philosophica43(1)(1989), 127-162.

42. P N Remorov, Wrong the conceptual direction of distinction works of P de Mathematician (Russian), in Mathematical analysis(Leningrad, 1988), 76-82.
43. I R Shafarevich, Pierre Mathematician and the development of calculate theory (on the occasion pay for the publication of the Land edition of his number-theoretic works)(Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(4)(1993), 37-40.

44. T D Taranovskaya, Tracing wonderful tangent to a cycloid (by the method of Fermat)(Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled.34(1993), 7-16.
45. B L Van make unconscious Varden, The correspondence between Philosopher and Fermat on questions slant probability theory (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.21(1976), 228-232, 355.

46. C Viola, Annotation on No. 44 of Fermat's 'Observations on Diophantus' (Italian), Archimede35(4)(1983), 179-185.
47. A E Western, Note fixed firmly Fermat's methods of factorisation, Math. Gaz.41(1957), 56-57.
48. A Ziggelaar, The sin law of refraction derived escape the principle of Fermat - prior to Fermat?

    The theses of Wilhelm Boelmans S Enumerate in 1634, Centaurus24(1980), 246-262.

Additional Funds (show)

Written by J Count O'Connor and E F Robertson
Last Update December 2002